Re: English Grammar question

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: English Grammar question
Date: 2011-03-30 08:18:35
Message-ID: AANLkTinLtoMH=4L4g7PhSWMJ3tJ4gsgc29wp3hLLPjdu@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
<susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> during translation the history.sgml - I found the following sentences in
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/history.html
>
> "The design of the rule system at that time was described in The design of
> the POSTGRES rules system. The rationale and architecture of the storage
> manager were detailed in The design of the POSTGRES storage system "
>
> I am not sure if the grammar is correct here.
>
> My feeling says it should be:
>
> "is decribed" and "are detailed"  instead of "was and were"
>
> I am pretty sure these books still exist.

I think both are correct, but you are right that those books still
exist and so it looks archaic and can be reworded.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-03-30 08:18:59 Re: English Grammar question
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-03-30 08:15:23 Re: English Grammar question