| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
| Date: | 2010-08-04 17:35:10 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinLTOANWzZ=jG23UTMWcdq0SxyyzA2Yfwiw+TDk@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> *scratches head*
>
>> One of those tests uses < and the other uses <=
>
>> Which one is wrong?
>
> Well, neither, since NUMERIC(0,0) is disallowed. However, it's probably
> not the place of these functions to assume that, so I'd suggest treating
> equality as valid.
OK, done. I renamed the argument from typemod to typmod so the tests
would all match byte-for-byte.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-08-04 17:56:16 | Re: patch for contrib/isn |
| Previous Message | Jan Otto | 2010-08-04 17:32:58 | patch for contrib/isn |