From: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command |
Date: | 2010-05-11 01:44:09 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinHuEBR1GuARRcJk-HHC-dnhobAILP_Q2c3QaB4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> A look at the code shows that the archiver only notices SIGHUP once
> per outer loop, so the change would only take effect once you catch up,
> which is not going to help much in this case. Possibly we should change
> it to check for SIGHUP after each archive_command execution.
>
> If you kill -9 the archiver process, the postmaster will just start
> a new one, but realize that that would result in two concurrent
> rsync's. It might work ok to kill -9 the archiver and the current
> rsync in the same command.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
I think I'll just wait it out, then sighup.
Thanks for looking into this.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bricklen | 2010-05-11 01:45:38 | Re: Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-05-11 01:23:51 | Re: peer-to-peer replication with Postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bricklen | 2010-05-11 01:45:38 | Re: Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-11 01:13:18 | Make archiver check for SIGHUP more often? |