From: | Whit Armstrong <armstrong(dot)whit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time |
Date: | 2010-07-27 16:57:18 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinF-bTnKM4=1hLE_hWAn4vWphT+Lse7cd2tRUCV@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Kevin,
While we're on the topic, do you also diable fsync?
We use xfs with battery-backed raid as well. We have had no issues with xfs.
I'm curious whether anyone can comment on his experience (good or bad)
using xfs/battery-backed-cache/fsync=off.
Thanks,
Whit
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
>
>> Also xfs has seen quite a bit of development in these later
>> kernels, any thoughts on that?
>
> We've been using xfs for a few years now with good performance and
> no problems other than needing to disable write barriers to get good
> performance out of our battery-backed RAID adapter.
>
> -Kevin
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-07-27 17:10:57 | Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-07-27 13:48:54 | Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time |