From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
Date: | 2010-09-21 08:52:42 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinEDbS10w4SVpPg00h39s+LucQOWnpyRBvN9c5_@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 21 September 2010 09:37, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> I really don't think an XML config would improve anything. In fact it
>> would just introduce more ways to break the config by the mere fact it
>> has to be well-formed. I'd be in favour of one similar to
>> pg_hba.conf, because then, at least, we'd still only have 2 formats of
>> configuration.
>
> Want to spend a few days hacking on a config editor for pgAdmin, and
> then re-evaluate that comment?
It would be quicker to add in support for a config format we don't use
yet than to duplicate support for a new config in the same format as
an existing one? Plus it's a compromise between user-screw-up-ability
and machine-readability.
My fear would be standby.conf would be edited by users who don't
really know XML and then we'd have 3 different styles of config to
tell the user to edit.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-09-21 08:59:14 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-09-21 08:37:44 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-09-21 08:53:48 | Re: ALTER TYPE extensions |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-09-21 08:52:24 | Re: SHOW TABLES |