Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

On 23 November 2010 22:04, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On fre, 2010-11-05 at 22:33 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 28 October 2010 20:15, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > It was already inconsistent in the SGML, but if you wish, I'll redo it so
>> > that they're all in tables.  That will mean taking the sections which kept
>> > index terms outside of tables already, and merging them with all the tables.
>> >  Will take me a while.
>>
>>
>> Okay, here's another version, moving index entries back from separate lists
>> into function tables, although I think I've done that for more than just my
>> own changes.
>
> Committed

Thanks Peter! :)

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935