| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump |
| Date: | 2011-02-09 01:31:00 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinCT_EFYBd2+-yO9kuA4a16iXw1U-F5T5BYBagm@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 13:34, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So how close are we to having a committable version of this? Should
> we push this out to 9.2?
I think so. The feature is pretty attractive, but more works are required:
* Re-base on synchronized snapshots patch
* Consider to use pipe also on Windows.
* Research libpq + fork() issue. We have a warning in docs:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/libpq-connect.html
| On Unix, forking a process with open libpq connections can lead to
unpredictable results
--
Itagaki Takahiro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-09 01:37:57 | Re: Revised patches to add table function support to PL/Tcl (TODO item) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-09 01:30:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |