From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Date: | 2010-09-14 16:17:56 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinAK7pSn7UfSNumBx8VHCX+pYjmUVeZdSxGXMzj@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> * One that creates the partial branch ecpg_big_bison. I think we have
>>> to live with this too. I don't want to drop the branch altogether,
>>> as that would represent a loss of development history. The only other
>>> alternative I can think of is to try to convert it into a full branch,
>>> but I'm unsure what the implications would be of that.
>
>> I doubt there's a clean way to do that. I am not sure there's much
>> point in moving the tag over to git - anyone wanting to do something
>> useful with it will need to use CVS anyway, won't they?
>
> Well ... I guess the other attitude we could take is that that was a
> private development branch of Michael's. If we'd been working in git
> at the time, that branch would never have been seen outside his personal
> repository, most likely. The changes did eventually get merged back to
> HEAD, so we'd not be losing anything critical if we just dropped the
> branch altogether. Anybody else have an opinion on what to do with it?
We're not planning to delete the CVS repository, are we?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-14 16:23:00 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-14 16:03:00 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-14 16:23:00 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-14 16:16:23 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |