From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature |
Date: | 2010-06-01 04:40:56 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinACNixo1nqbnlWjBNtvCd1TubReBq3CbOLzoEP@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/6/1 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> On May 31, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I was going to propose ==> across the board.
>
>> What about -> ?
>
> hstore already uses that for something else.
>
> Robert's idea isn't a bad one if we're forced to rename the operator.
> I'd still like to know exactly how hard the concrete has set on the
> SQL spec draft, first. (Peter?)
>
I agree with Tom - we are not hurry. Creating some synonym operator
for hstore like "==>" can be a good idea.
regards
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesper Krogh | 2010-06-01 04:50:45 | Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off. |
Previous Message | Giles Lean | 2010-06-01 04:35:50 | Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows |