From: | Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby switchover |
Date: | 2010-06-22 11:33:33 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin9g2mHKOx_beoyrf3BHH3F-8Y3C-RrauEQIa8X@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>wrote:
> Now, you can change the primary_conninfo on C so that it connects to
> B. I guess that means a restart. Note that you only want to do that once
> server B is the new master, so has been triggered as such. That means a
> change of TimeLine, though, so it'll break streaming : that's when you
> need to read the WALs from the archive, with the restore_command.
>
So does that mean we don't have to build C from scratch like we will be
doing for A? Is that because B and C were both slaves and reading from the
same archive directory and at same point in time when we did the switchover.
>
> Then, to have the old master A a slave of the new master B, you need to
> do a full slave setup here, with base backup and all.
>
This is what I expected but just wanted to confirm. Thanks a lot for the
detailed explanation on all steps.
> I hope we will be able to get cascading support in 9.1 or before so that
> it's possible to simplify all this by having a "relay" server in the
> mix, so that you only talk to this one when changing the master.
>
It will be just awesome to have such support as cascading at times is really
helpful. But again comparing to other third party solutions it seems just
very simple to setup for replication and sure does work nice. I cant wait
for 9.1 already :)
Regards,
--
Shoaib Mir
http://shoaibmir.wordpress.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Deven | 2010-06-22 11:50:27 | Facing Problem in Autovacuuming Deamon.... |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2010-06-22 11:28:32 | Re: How to force select to return exactly one row |