Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bob Lunney <bob_lunney(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Wilcox <hungrytom(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t
Date: 2010-06-10 01:49:53
Message-ID: AANLkTin9D34AnGHhiyjUtpWV_B7IaSctHdeHfTpqiipF@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bob Lunney <bob_lunney(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Your other option, of course, is a nice 64-bit linux variant, which won't have this problem at all.

Although, even there, I think I've heard that after 10GB you don't get
much benefit from raising it further. Not sure if that's accurate or
not...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-10 01:51:39 Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-09 20:11:25 Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?