| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
| Date: | 2011-02-16 17:43:13 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTin7LnkRxQ1NDm01keLkiU6+F_5rdB5=JAczvTeQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 16.02.2011 19:29, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> Actually, on further reflection, I'm not even sure why we bother with
>> the fsync. It seems like a useful safeguard but I'm not seeing how we
>> can get to that point without having fsync'd everything anyway. Am I
>> missing something?
>
> WalRcvDie() is called on error. For example, if the connection dies
> unexpectedly during walrcv_receive().
Ah, OK.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-16 17:44:26 | Re: contrib loose ends: 9.0 to 9.1 incompatibilities |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-16 17:41:28 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |