From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
Date: | 2010-09-14 13:58:57 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin6On2ihxHLMvCiCJ_PCoRTbHWejZ1ScDN36dZR@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
On 14 September 2010 10:23, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
> On 13/09/2010 23:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I really like the callout and table formatting in the example format.
>> Looks very nice and modern.
>
> +1 to all the positive comments - I think it's a great improvement.
>
> In fact, I'd take it further and make the sub-section headings (4.1.1, etc)
> a more prominent colour, so that they stand out more when scanning a page at
> high speed.
>
> I like the rollover effect on tables also - it'll make large tables easier
> to scan.
>
> Good one Thom et al!
I think a consensus needs to be reached on what you guys want
changing. Implementing changes isn't a problem, it's what changes
should be implemented. Whatever is decided, it needs to be easy to
visually scan the page and its sections, clean and consistent.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-09-14 16:15:02 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2010-09-14 09:23:25 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-14 14:19:18 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2010-09-14 09:23:25 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |