From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |
Date: | 2010-10-21 03:01:59 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin0H3g=3LeJQo0soKiXt+r-tZtuRgZeyW1erUuv@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires?
I think JSON is also reasonable, but one of the problem to use JSON format is
we cannot apply the extension patch until JSON patch has been applied ;-)
BTW, does anyone needs JSON formatted configuration files for other purposes?
There might be some discussions in "Standby registration" or "Configuring
synchronous replication" threads. Module control files are so simple that
they don't always require JSON format, such as nested variable. But
configuration files for replication might be more complex. If needed,
it would be reasonable to introduce a JSON reader.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-21 03:11:22 | Re: lazy snapshots? |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-21 03:01:39 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |