From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: do we need to postpone beta4? |
Date: | 2010-07-27 21:46:59 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin=ZEEnxy-tvx3GSwvb3U8YtgykczYLcibPgSBY@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Well, that's pretty much saying we won't release before September.
>>
>> Yup, that's what I think. In fact I think September might be
>> optimistic. This is what happens when you fork early and allow
>> developers to start focusing on new development instead of testing
>> the release branch.
>
> [poorly worded protest]
Sorry - I apologize for that email. As has been pointed out to me
off-list, that was too strongly worded and not constructive. Still, I
don't think there is much evidence for the proposition that the
current delays are caused by having branched early. I think they're
caused by people being out of town.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-27 21:51:24 | Re: Toward a column reorder solution |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-07-27 21:45:29 | Re: Toward a column reorder solution |