| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: tuplestore, tuplesort aggregate functions |
| Date: | 2010-08-19 20:27:00 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimxvTRy1Z3eBkzuPtaLsBHuoEooDZkTCpmXt9a=@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> You've made this assertion at least three times now, but I confess
>> that I've only ever learned one way to compute a median; and quick
>> Google searches for "median", "kinds of median", and few other
>> variants failed to turn up anything obvious either.
>
> There are different ways to define it when the number of samples is even.
> However I believe that "use the mean of the two middle values" is much
> the most common way to deal with that.
I suppose there could also be a bit of an ambiguity if you're working
with a type like int4 where the values are discrete steps. Like, what
do you do with {1, 2}?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-19 20:38:12 | Re: proposal: tuplestore, tuplesort aggregate functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-19 20:21:30 | Re: proposal: tuplestore, tuplesort aggregate functions |