Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> hmm ok - but assuming sync rep we would end up with something like the
> following(hypotetically assuming each operation takes 1 time unit):
>
> originally:
>
> write 1
> sync 1
> network 1
> write 1
> sync 1
>
> total: 5
>
> whereas in the new case we would basically have the write+sync compete with
> network+write+sync in parallel(total 3 units) and we would only have to wait
> for the slower of those two sets of operations instead of the total time of
> both or am I missing something.

Yeah, this is what I'd like to say. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center