| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | david(at)kineticode(dot)com, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
| Date: | 2010-08-08 18:05:53 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimwd2zZbd8ieY4dBB6=an47HJQqARXzr5+Ush0V@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/8 Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> I didn't use a correct name - so "indexed set" is better.
>
> How would such a thing differ from a RAM-based local temporary table?
temporary tables are too heavy for this purposes. In SQL environment I
expecting a transactional behave from tables. It isn't necessary. Next
tables are strict structure. And it can be useless for storing a set
of parameters.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-08 18:16:45 | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-08 18:01:48 | Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch |