From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Slow Query- Simple taking |
Date: | 2010-10-28 16:18:31 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimvSPN6OkBCNbJU8MG6tV8beVjaVee+u93QUbp+@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Mladen Gogala
<mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 10:53 AM, Richard Broersma wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Mladen Gogala
>> <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yyesss! Any time frame on that? Can you make it into 9.0.2?
>>
>> Maybe 9.1.0 or 9.2.0 :) 9.0's features are already frozen.
>>
>>
> Well, with all this global warming around us, index scans may still thaw in
> time to make it into 9.0.2
I fear this is not going to happen for 9.1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-28 16:21:01 | Re: Query much faster with enable_seqscan=0 |
Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2010-10-28 15:37:28 | Re: Massive update, memory usage |