Re: Dynamic binding in plpgsql function

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pierre Racine <Pierre(dot)Racine(at)sbf(dot)ulaval(dot)ca>
Cc: Vibhor Kumar <vibhor(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dynamic binding in plpgsql function
Date: 2011-03-02 15:12:12
Message-ID: AANLkTimteqtFCAAw_Bpm13e=KWMBE19VNLyk0hmAH7o6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Pierre Racine
<Pierre(dot)Racine(at)sbf(dot)ulaval(dot)ca> wrote:
> Is EXECUTE slower than a direct assignment call?

It is going to be slower, but how much slower and if it justifies the
mechanism is going to be a matter of your requirements, definition of
'slow', and willingness to experiment.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rayner Julio Rodríguez Pimentel 2011-03-02 15:41:12 I need your help to get opinions about this situation
Previous Message Pierre Racine 2011-03-02 15:06:53 Re: Dynamic binding in plpgsql function