From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Date: | 2010-09-14 16:30:32 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimsp2bvJ5kaJfGT4jJ=ku_dF7hq+55ukXNO0MhL@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> We're not planning to delete the CVS repository, are we?
>
> Not in the short term, but I'd like to think that the git repository
> will contain everything of conceivable interest.
Hmm, OK. That's never really been one of my goals. :-)
I want a good, clean, complete history in git, but ancient partial
branches are below my threshold for caring. But if you feel it's
useful, we can keep the tag - I don't care enough to argue about it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-14 16:34:10 | Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-14 16:26:47 | Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-09-14 16:32:16 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-09-14 16:29:07 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |