Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date: 2010-09-14 16:30:32
Message-ID: AANLkTimsp2bvJ5kaJfGT4jJ=ku_dF7hq+55ukXNO0MhL@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> We're not planning to delete the CVS repository, are we?
>
> Not in the short term, but I'd like to think that the git repository
> will contain everything of conceivable interest.

Hmm, OK. That's never really been one of my goals. :-)

I want a good, clean, complete history in git, but ancient partial
branches are below my threshold for caring. But if you feel it's
useful, we can keep the tag - I don't care enough to argue about it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-09-14 16:34:10 Serializable Snapshot Isolation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-14 16:26:47 Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-09-14 16:32:16 Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-09-14 16:29:07 Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements