| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Voils, Steven M" <steve(at)sensorswitch(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Primary key vs unique index | 
| Date: | 2011-03-17 18:52:25 | 
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimrbrGNzUCk8i6yy9ABZyxTHs95J+0Tbj3Te478@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Voils, Steven M <steve(at)sensorswitch(dot)com> wrote:
>> Is there a fundamental difference between a primary key and a unique index?
>> Currently we have primary keys on tables that have significant amounts of
>> updates performed on them, as a result the primary key indexes are becoming
>> significantly bloated.  There are other indexes on the tables that also
>> become bloated as a result of this, but these are automatically rebuild
>> periodically by the application (using the concurrently flag) when read
>> usage is expected to be very low.
>
> If you're experiencing bloat, but not deleting huge chunks of your
> table at a time, then you're not vacuuming aggressively enough
Or you're on 8.3 or before and blowing out your free space map.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Voils, Steven M | 2011-03-17 18:59:00 | Re: Primary key vs unique index | 
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-03-17 18:51:45 | Re: Primary key vs unique index |