| From: | Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Compression hacks? |
| Date: | 2011-02-25 06:55:23 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimgwW1osAoqyxmHzj+s4sbq0tgJmgWn5kd-AgxX@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
For various workloads, compression could be a win on both disk space
and speed (see, e.g.,
http://blog.oskarsson.nu/2009/03/hadoop-feat-lzo-save-disk-space-and.html)
I realize Postgresql doesn't have general table compression a la
InnoDB's row_format=compressed (there's TOAST for large values and
there's some old discussion on
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CompressedTables) but I thought I'd
ask: anybody tried to compress their PG data somehow? E.g., any
positive experiences running PG on a compressed filesystem (and any
caveats)? Anecdotal stories of the effects of app-level large-field
compression in analytical workloads (though I'd be curious about
transactional workloads as well)? Thanks in advance.
--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2011-02-25 07:21:15 | Re: Compression hacks? |
| Previous Message | zab08 | 2011-02-25 06:15:24 | PostgreSQL group sort |