| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS) |
| Date: | 2010-07-21 07:53:31 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimcWwPm7J9WGp1H_KcUlC3TZQhndBirFprjxiLb@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> My preference would be to stick to a style where we identify the
>> committer using the author tag and note the patch author, reviewers,
>> whether the committer made changes, etc. in the commit message. A
>> single author field doesn't feel like enough for our workflow, and
>> having a mix of authors and committers in the author field seems like
>> a mess.
>
> Well, I had looked forward to actually putting the real author into the
> author field.
I hadn't realised that was possible until Guillaume did so on his
first commit to the new pgAdmin GIT repo. It seems to work nicely:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=08e2826d90129bd4e4b3b7462bab682dd6a703e4
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-07-21 08:33:51 | Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-07-21 07:48:57 | Re: Synchronous replication |