From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Count backend self-sync calls |
Date: | 2010-11-14 22:32:34 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimc4jdP+0z3OpgMHtGKHDLAg9cL6KZeTJxi1VYR@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The patch also adds some logging to the innards involved here, to help with
> understanding problems in this area. I don't think that should be in the
> version committed as is. May want to drop the logging level or make it
> disabled in regular builds, since it is sitting somewhere it generates a lot
> of log data and adds overhead.
I think this one could be removed:
+ if (n > 0)
+ elog(DEBUG1,"Absorbing %d fsync requests",n);
But if this is generating a lot of log data or adding a lot of
overhead, then you have bigger problems anyway:
+ elog(DEBUG1, "Unable to forward fsync request, executing directly");
I'm inclined to change that to an ereport(), but otherwise it seems
OK. Also, how about referring to this as buffers_backend_fsync
consistently throughout, instead of dropping the "f" in some places?
With those changes, I think this is committable, and will do so,
barring objections.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-14 23:10:49 | Re: Count backend self-sync calls |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-14 22:28:09 | Re: Refactoring the Type System |