Re: Cascading Recovery

From: Selva manickaraja <mavles78(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cascading Recovery
Date: 2011-02-11 17:43:35
Message-ID: AANLkTimbzyWyDoA3aynTqW32Fmwt=5JmGj+n+f_-CYq+@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

If not with Streaming Replication, what about Continous Archiving Mode?

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>wrote:

> Le 11/02/2011 05:43, Selva manickaraja a écrit :
> > We are considering on using a primary and 2 secondary machines. But our
> plan
> > is to cascade the recovery as follows:
> >
> > 1. Primary Machine-A (read and write operation)
> > 2. Secondary Machine-B (recover from Machine A)
> > 3. Secondary Machine-C (recover from Machine B)
> >
> > We are planning this kind of recovery as we want to phase out recovery
> > interval between C and B 30 minutes.
> >
> > Can this be achieved by PostgreSQL.
> >
>
> Not with Streaming Replication. But you can achieve this with a
> different replication engine, like Slony.
>
>
> --
> Guillaume
> http://www.postgresql.fr
> http://dalibo.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jf 2011-02-11 19:53:43 increased load on server
Previous Message Stefanie Weykam 2011-02-11 17:14:46 Re: pdAdmin uninstall - how to get rid of temp files?