From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Adjusted the hackers mailing list |
Date: | 2010-06-17 17:17:50 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimW__gDc1HmUC7YqymhepCy_oLFNHLjslyHOtCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
>> You may have noticed some old emails just showing up
>> on the hackers list. They were held because their
>> "header lines were too long." I've just changed the limits
>> on the hackers list as follows:
>
>> max_header_line_length from 1024 to 2048
>> max_mime_header_length from 1024 to 2048
>
>> The trapped messages were at lengths of 1030 or so.
>
> Actually, long threads tend to run into that restriction on all the
> lists --- it's the References: lines that get long. If we're going to
> increase the limit (which I agree with) please do it across the board
> not just for -hackers.
I think we shouldn't raise it to 10240 rather than just 2048. I mean,
what are we afraid of with long headers, that the mail servers will
run out of memory on a 1k header?
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-06-17 17:41:41 | Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-17 17:06:28 | Re: Adjusted the hackers mailing list |