From: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Old versions directories on the ftp site |
Date: | 2010-10-05 17:47:26 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimWPkW9gKQDC9D=1RDqWU8Enzj7LP7ErF2My5RB@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> We have a policy to keep two (IIRC) versions of each version in the
>> ftp site. How about we stick a README file in all the ones that are
>> not current saying something along the line of "NOTE! This is an old
>> release available for historical reasons only. You should probably use
>> the latest one". That will automatically render it up on the website,
>> which should make it at least theoretically possible that someone
>> reads it..
>
> I thought all the really old versions were pushed over to ftp-archive
> already?
>
> I should think that someone who chooses to look into an 8.1
> subdirectory, when there are 8.2 etc right next to it, is already
> well aware that he's grabbing an old version. I'm not sure that
> this proposal offers more than an annoying nag message.
I think the point was for links sent out in release messages (only 2
weeks old in this case for 9.0), and they go directly to 9.0.0
directory, missing 9.0.1.
For example, the release linked:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/v9.0.0/
So, if you went directly there, there's no indication a newer release
is available.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-10-05 17:50:22 | Re: Old versions directories on the ftp site |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-10-05 17:46:35 | Given that 9.0.1 is out ... |