From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: System catalog changes between 9.0 beta4 and rc1 |
Date: | 2010-09-02 17:14:21 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimVxG4Ed2_upkMkqJXaJBme1ke1ayvzTjT6UWWU@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2 September 2010 17:45, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>> I've asked this question on IRC, but unfortunately no answer. Could
>> someone tell me what system catalog changes were made between 9.0
>> beta4 and RC1?
>
> The CVS (or soon to be git) log for catversion.h is a good place to
> look for answers to such questions.
> http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/catalog/catversion.h
>
> In this case the answer is:
>
> Remove the single-argument form of string_agg(). It added nothing much in
> functionality, while creating an ambiguity in usage with ORDER BY that at
> least two people have already gotten seriously confused by. Also, add an
> opr_sanity test to check that we don't in future violate the newly minted
> policy of not having built-in aggregates with the same name and different
> numbers of parameters. Per discussion of a complaint from Thom Brown.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
For some reason I thought that was beta 4 but I've obviously got my
versions mixed up.
Thanks Tom.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-02 17:22:07 | Re: On-disk size of db increased after restore |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-02 17:08:41 | Re: On-disk size of db increased after restore |