From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren |
Date: | 2010-12-22 06:51:09 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimV7YZHACN=MugXu0GSUg=-7z34EjsyM1JHK3_L@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> How about doing target != ALL test at the head for the most common case
>> (target == ALL)?
>
> That's an idea, but the test you propose implements it incorrectly.
Thanks! I revised the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
signal-some-children-v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-12-22 07:15:17 | Re: Can postgres create a file with physically continuous blocks. |
Previous Message | Jesper Krogh | 2010-12-22 05:24:48 | Re: The cost of visibillity testing? (gin-search) |