Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date: 2010-10-17 22:52:35
Message-ID: AANLkTimTbnHjxOd_tVFFd2QW4V_LVA6MiFAQwdUwktH3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.
>

If only we knew someone in Redhat :)

iirc the issue was binary upgrades. So I suspect the answer will be
"the next time we break pg_upgrade and require a dump/reload". This is
the cost we chose to pay for binary upgrades.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-10-17 22:58:21 Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-10-17 22:50:34 Re: WIP: extensible enums