| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com> |
| Cc: | ext Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, ext Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field |
| Date: | 2010-10-12 12:36:24 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimSDmGHjnLVh5Zh7mixwg4e5uf6qgQrcboJ9cr9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
<ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com> wrote:
> The difference to my test is that we use the ODBC interface in our C program. Could it be that the difference in the runtimes is caused by the ODBC?
I've heard tell that ODBC is substantially slower than a native libpq
connection, but I don't know that for a fact, not being an ODBC user.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Nelson | 2010-10-12 13:07:46 | Re: Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-12 12:34:23 | Re: How does PG know if data is in memory? |