Re: Additional Grants To SuperUser?

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Carlos Mennens <carlos(dot)mennens(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Additional Grants To SuperUser?
Date: 2011-02-08 12:09:29
Message-ID: AANLkTimRUYjnhknzuva_to3Dz8uCXuWRt9QBaSmJEqRD@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2011/2/7 Carlos Mennens <carlos(dot)mennens(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > These all (SUPERUSER, CREATEDB, SUPERUSER) are role attributes.
> > By performing ALTER ROLE postgres NOSUPERUSER it is possible to
> > turn role with a superuser status into a role that just can create
> databases
> > and manage roles (admin, but without superuser privileges).
>
> So is it very bad to alter ANY of the default role attributes granted
> to the 'postgres' user? I don't know if removing role attributes from
> him will have negative consequences to features / functional tasks of
> the PostgreSQL server / client application(s).
>
Nothing special in 'postgres' user from the POV of DBMS. It is just a user
with superuser attribute created when you perform initdb(1).
But please note, some OS distributives uses 'postgres' for non-interactive
access to all databases for automatic maintenance (custom daily cronjobs,
replication, and similar tasks) -- please see you pg_hba.conf file where
entry for 'postgres' user usually resides.

>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
// Dmitriy.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2011-02-08 12:23:54 Re: about PostgreSQL 9.0.3 RPMs
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-02-08 12:05:55 Re: Maintenance commands on standby servers