From: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Broken due to CVS branching? .bki has wrong info for build |
Date: | 2010-07-17 19:02:12 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimQTcVmjnZSaTdHIbnRgVfJbHc1g4f1e18jRucF@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I pulled the latest from the git repo, I got this error on initdb:
>
>> creating template1 database in testdb/base/1 ... initdb: input file
>> "/usr/local/pg90/share/postgresql/postgres.bki" does not belong to
>> PostgreSQL 9.0devel
>
>> The problem was having '9.1' instead of '9.0' in the first line of the .bki.
>
> Yeah, I ran into that too. The makefiles don't have a dependency that
> forces postgres.bki to be rebuilt when you update the major version in
> configure.in. Just delete src/backend/catalog/postgres.bki and
> rebuild/reinstall. (Actually, as of CVS HEAD it shouldn't be a problem
> anymore because of yesterday's changes in pg_proc.h.)
>
> I'm not sure whether it's worth adding an explicit dependency to cover
> this case. It only comes into play at major version boundaries.
Ok, that makes sense.
I rebuilt just now, and it worked fine.
Thanks!
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-07-17 19:09:06 | Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-07-17 18:14:56 | Re: Synchronous replication |