Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction
Date: 2010-11-10 04:05:27
Message-ID: AANLkTimPonhgJThPBh_Bt-Ug6ckuKRO4eBXVhFsQKx4+@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>> But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
>>>> If so, let's change
>>>> the name.
>>>
>>> *None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.
>>
>> OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.
>
> Committed.

Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-10 04:06:50 Re: security hooks on object creation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-10 04:04:57 We need index-only scans