| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction |
| Date: | 2010-11-10 04:05:27 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimPonhgJThPBh_Bt-Ug6ckuKRO4eBXVhFsQKx4+@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>> But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
>>>> If so, let's change
>>>> the name.
>>>
>>> *None* of these names are intuitive. So let's just go for consistency.
>>
>> OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.
>
> Committed.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-10 04:06:50 | Re: security hooks on object creation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-11-10 04:04:57 | We need index-only scans |