From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Keywords files |
Date: | 2010-12-30 08:53:15 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimOUd5STdBy6_DgzH3QTvooA_V3Bqaj_14+VBQv@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 20:27, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:55, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> We haven't updated the keywords.cpp file for ages. In fact, so long
>>>> ago that the instructions are incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Recent versions of postgresql installs the list of keywords in
>>>> kwlist.h. That requires PostgreSQL 8.4 or later.
>>>>
>>>> How old versions of the PostgreSQL *source* do we accept building
>>>> against? Couldn't we just switch to using this include file instead,
>>>> thus saying you need 8.4 or later to build? (it should still *run*
>>>> against earlier versions just fine..)
>>>
>>> Iirc, we need 8.3 (or whichever version included pgconninfoparse). I'm
>>> fine with moving to using the new include file - iirc, most distros
>>> have an 8.4 build now.
>>
>> That turned out to be a bit more work than I thought, mainly because
>> there were EnterpriseDB and Greenplum keywords included in the pgadmin
>> list - which was only documented in one of the two places where they
>> occurred :-)
>>
>> Anyway, attached is a patch that I believe does this right. If you
>> prefer an easier view, see
>> https://github.com/mhagander/pgadmin3/compare/master...keywords
>>
>> Does this look ok?
>>
>> It does move the keyword definitions out of the header and into
>> keywords.cpp - but they aren't used anywhere.. So in general, I'm
>> fairly confident with it...
>
> I don't see any obvious problems.
If you didn't notice already ;), I've now applied this version.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-12-30 09:38:41 | Re: Source reindenting |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-12-30 08:52:02 | Re: Source reindenting |