From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include the backend ID in the relpath of temporary relations. |
Date: | 2010-08-14 02:19:58 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimN7Ej1Fiyr1E3p+iJHbp6Mvq-ue9z71-1DJ7Qg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I have taken a crack at fixing this but someone who understands DTrace
>> better than I do may want to check and see if the changes look sane.
>> It appears to me that we have no documentation - not even so much as a
>> source code comment - explaining how these probes are supposed to work
>> or what the arguments to each one are intended mean.
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/dynamic-trace.html#DTRACE-PROBE-POINT-TABLE
>
> (... which you now need to update ...)
>
> I think your confusion may stem from the fact that the definition of the
> buffer-read-done probe was actually wrong, AFAICS. The docs say its
> last 3 args were bools, which was reasonable, but the definition said
> int for the first of those. Which is what you want now ...
No, it was the original patch that mangled that. I think the real
problem is that (1) I didn't test with dtrace enabled when writing the
patch, or maybe I did somewhere in the middle but not at the end and
(2) I didn't realize there were docs.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-14 02:22:11 | pgsql: Further dtrace adjustments for the backend-IDs-in-relpath patch. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-13 23:23:14 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include the backend ID in the relpath of temporary relations. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 02:25:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
Previous Message | James William Pye | 2010-08-14 02:16:27 | Re: Python 2.7 deprecated the PyCObject API? |