Re: Admission Control

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Admission Control
Date: 2010-07-09 04:20:59
Message-ID: AANLkTimM2FpQpS1CwWb07vftNv9TR-5eId8DvozzCUee@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Mark Kirkwood
<mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
> On 09/07/10 15:57, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> Hmm.  Well, those numbers seem awfully high, for what you're doing,
>> then.  An admission control mechanism that's just letting everything
>> in shouldn't knock 5% off performance (let alone 30%).
>
> Yeah it does, on the other hand both Josh and I were trying to elicit the
> worst case overhead.

Even so...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-07-09 04:26:12 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-07-09 04:20:17 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.