From: | Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104 |
Date: | 2010-08-24 13:35:48 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimKz2PO0_duL6Gxw_p3rX3NduGDFJR=5q9iQYSv@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I finished the MERGE on inheritance tables. Now comes the merge_v201
The test example can be found at
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/MergeTestExamples#MERGE_on_inheritance
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here comes the new patch for MERGE command. It has the following features:
>
> 1. It is based on Heikki's merge_v102-cleanedup.patch. So, it is
> (hopefully) clean -- no meaningless white spaces and no overlong clause.
>
> 2. The "replaced" mark in MERGE query and plan structures are removed. In
> rewriter, the actions replaced by INSTEAD rules will be changed into DO
> NOTHING actions.
>
> 3. _outDeleteStmt() is removed from code.
>
> 4. EXPLAIN MERGE is improved much. You can see the new examples at
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/MergeTestExamples#Explain_Merge
>
> 5. The subplan/sublinks are supported in merge actions now. Try the
> examples at
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/MergeTestExamples#Subplan.2Fsublinks_in_action
>
> 6. Updated merge.sql and merge.out for regress
>
> 7. The inheritance is still NOT supported yet.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
>
> Yours Boxuan
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
merge_v201.tar | application/x-tar | 120.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-24 13:36:05 | Re: Unable to drop role |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-24 13:32:37 | Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this? |