From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Primary Key index |
Date: | 2010-08-25 19:21:15 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimDi72ry2YH=URABA6n=n-eO8nGpf4pxUEcRH38@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 25 August 2010 20:15, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>
>>>> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section
>>>> of the Constraints page. While the information already exists
>>>> on the CREATE TABLE, I don't think a brief mention on the page
>>>> specifically concerning primary keys could hurt.
>>>>
>>>> So here's a patch to add it. Worth adding?
>>>
>>> <firstterm> is probably not appropriate here, because you are not
>>> defining the term for the first time.
>>>
>> That is true.
>
> It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new
> patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
Sure, go for it. :)
> In any
> event, we should probably mention this for all three constraint
> types which automatically create an index: PRIMARY KEY, UNIQUE, and
> EXCLUSION.
Agreed, and I didn't actually think about the fact that exclusion
constraints add indexes.
--
Thom Brown
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mariano Reingart | 2010-08-25 20:04:09 | Compiling and Linking Dynamically-Loaded Functions on Windows |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-25 19:15:03 | Re: Primary Key index |