From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Date: | 2011-02-14 12:40:35 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimDKWB+xfrfzat1JHBEUSHQJeuUtuN7VHWR6kTd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 13:37, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/10/2011 11:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607109
>>
>> It seems we may have a problem to consider. As far as I know, we are the
>> only major platform that supports libedit but our default is readline.
>> Unfortunately readline is not compatible with OpenSSL (apparently?)
>> licensing.
>
> Anybody realized that this Debian bug (and several others) got closed in
> the mean time (Sunday)? According to the changelog [1], Martin Pitt
> (which I'm CC'ing here, as he might not be aware of this thread, yet)
> worked around this issue by pre-loading readline via LD_PRELOAD for psql.
>
> Personally, I'm a bit suspicious about that solution (technically as
> well as from a licensing perspective), but it's probably the simplest
> way to let only psql link against readline.
That is a rather ugly workaround, but if it works and actually fixes
the license considerations, then it's at least better than nothing at
all.
Not sure it's a reason not to have our own packaging (mainly because
we could provide the version compatibility mix), but it would
certainly reduce the urgency.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-02-14 12:52:46 | Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites |
Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2011-02-14 12:37:35 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |