Re: State of multi-master replication options

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: CS DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of multi-master replication options
Date: 2011-01-20 17:28:25
Message-ID: AANLkTimD-S6n7sS2BErXFwU95aOiyxg5x15VvN1yhaOb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:53 AM, CS DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I suspect I know the answer to this...
>
> What's the current state of multi-master replication for PostgreSQL? Is
> Bucardo the only true master/master solution out there that might be worthy
> of a production push?  Is Postres-R a candidate at this point (I suspect
> not)? Are there any other master/master or preferably  multi-master (3+
> masters) solutions available?

Unless you roll your own with separate sequence ranges and inherited
tables via slony, yes, Bucardo seems to be it right now.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bradley Holbrook 2011-01-20 17:42:02 Re: Postgres Backup Utility
Previous Message CS DBA 2011-01-20 16:53:02 State of multi-master replication options