From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ambiguous index entry for Privileges |
Date: | 2011-02-21 10:36:53 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimBqxEFQhTeTDtaeMwuSptGzbk0N16Uj-UsDOgS@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 21 February 2011 03:21, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Applied.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> > Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> > > On 12 August 2010 00:05, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> > >> I noticed that there are 2 linked entries for "Privileges":
>> > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/bookindex.html#AEN128982
>> > >>
>> > >> While they both go to different pages (with admittedly very
>> > >> similar content), those pages are both entitled "Privileges" so
>> > >> it's unclear from the index which page you'll end up at. Can we
>> > >> rename one of those pages to clarify as it looks weird in the
>> > >> index.
>> > >
>> > > Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>> >
>> > Sure -- I think the page at
>> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/privileges.html (in
>> > "Chapter 20. Database Roles and Privileges" should be more
>> > conceptual rather than a subset of the other page. Rather than
>> > explaining how to use GRANT and REVOKE to change privileges, it
>> > should give an overview of privileges and discuss what is allowed by
>> > each particular privilege. It could link to the other page, so
>> > there would be one place to keep up-to-date on how to grant and
>> > revoke privileges.
>> >
>> > I think the page at
>> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/ddl-priv.html (in "Chapter
>> > 5. Data Definition") should be renamed to something more like
>> > "Modifying Privileges" or "Granting and Revoking Privileges" (or
>> > something to that effect). It might make sense to have its entry in
>> > the index be a secondary entry under privilege, with some similar
>> > qualification.
>>
>> I went even farther. I think there is no need to discuss object
>> permissions in the database roles chapter. We already link to the DDL
>> section, so I just changed that to link specifically to the DDL
>> privileges section, and made that DDL privileges section be a
>> super-set of the two old sections.
>>
>> Patch attached.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
>> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>>
>> + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>
> [ text/x-diff is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN ]
>
>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
>> index a65b4bc..519afd6 100644
>> *** a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
>> --- b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
>> *************** ALTER TABLE products RENAME TO items;
>> *** 1400,1412 ****
>> <see>privilege</see>
>> </indexterm>
>>
>> <para>
>> ! When you create a database object, you become its owner. By
>> ! default, only the owner of an object can do anything with the
>> ! object. In order to allow other users to use it,
>> ! <firstterm>privileges</firstterm> must be granted. (However,
>> ! users that have the superuser attribute can always
>> ! access any object.)
>> </para>
>>
>> <para>
>> --- 1400,1432 ----
>> <see>privilege</see>
>> </indexterm>
>>
>> + <indexterm zone="ddl-priv">
>> + <primary>owner</primary>
>> + </indexterm>
>> +
>> + <indexterm zone="ddl-priv">
>> + <primary>GRANT</primary>
>> + </indexterm>
>> +
>> + <indexterm zone="ddl-priv">
>> + <primary>REVOKE</primary>
>> + </indexterm>
>> +
>> <para>
>> ! When an object is created, it is assigned an owner. The
>> ! owner is normally the role that executed the creation statement.
>> ! For most kinds of objects, the initial state is that only the owner
>> ! (or a superuser) can do anything with the object. To allow
>> ! other roles to use it, <firstterm>privileges</firstterm> must be
>> ! granted.
>> ! There are several different kinds of privilege: <literal>SELECT</>,
>> ! <literal>INSERT</>, <literal>UPDATE</>, <literal>DELETE</>,
>> ! <literal>TRUNCATE</>, <literal>REFERENCES</>, <literal>TRIGGER</>,
>> ! <literal>CREATE</>, <literal>CONNECT</>, <literal>TEMPORARY</>,
>> ! <literal>EXECUTE</>, and <literal>USAGE</>.
>> ! For more information on the different types of privileges supported by
>> ! <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, see the
>> ! <xref linkend="sql-grant"> reference page.
>> </para>
>>
>> <para>
>> *************** ALTER TABLE products RENAME TO items;
>> *** 1429,1442 ****
>> the owner only.
>> </para>
>>
>> ! <note>
>> ! <para>
>> ! To change the owner of a table, index, sequence, or view, use the
>> ! <xref linkend="sql-altertable">
>> ! command. There are corresponding <literal>ALTER</> commands for
>> ! other object types.
>> ! </para>
>> ! </note>
>>
>> <para>
>> To assign privileges, the <command>GRANT</command> command is
>> --- 1449,1462 ----
>> the owner only.
>> </para>
>>
>> ! <para>
>> ! An object can be assigned to a new owner with an <command>ALTER</command>
>> ! command of the appropriate kind for the object, e.g. <xref
>> ! linkend="sql-altertable">. Superusers can always do
>> ! this; ordinary roles can only do it if they are both the current owner
>> ! of the object (or a member of the owning role) and a member of the new
>> ! owning role.
>> ! </para>
>>
>> <para>
>> To assign privileges, the <command>GRANT</command> command is
>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml
>> index 2830aec..6a52827 100644
>> *** a/doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml
>> --- b/doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml
>> ***************
>> *** 1,7 ****
>> <!-- doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml -->
>>
>> <chapter id="user-manag">
>> ! <title>Database Roles and Privileges</title>
>>
>> <para>
>> <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> manages database access permissions
>> --- 1,7 ----
>> <!-- doc/src/sgml/user-manag.sgml -->
>>
>> <chapter id="user-manag">
>> ! <title>Database Roles</title>
>>
>> <para>
>> <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> manages database access permissions
>> ***************
>> *** 22,31 ****
>> </para>
>>
>> <para>
>> ! This chapter describes how to create and manage roles and introduces
>> ! the privilege system. More information about the various types of
>> ! database objects and the effects of privileges can be found in
>> ! <xref linkend="ddl">.
>> </para>
>>
>> <sect1 id="database-roles">
>> --- 22,30 ----
>> </para>
>>
>> <para>
>> ! This chapter describes how to create and manage roles.
>> ! More information about the effects of privileges on various database
>> ! objects can be found in <xref linkend="ddl-priv">.
>> </para>
>>
>> <sect1 id="database-roles">
>> *************** ALTER ROLE myname SET enable_indexscan T
>> *** 282,362 ****
>> </para>
>> </sect1>
>>
>> - <sect1 id="privileges">
>> - <title>Privileges</title>
>> -
>> - <indexterm zone="privileges">
>> - <primary>privilege</primary>
>> - </indexterm>
>> -
>> - <indexterm zone="privileges">
>> - <primary>owner</primary>
>> - </indexterm>
>> -
>> - <indexterm zone="privileges">
>> - <primary>GRANT</primary>
>> - </indexterm>
>> -
>> - <indexterm zone="privileges">
>> - <primary>REVOKE</primary>
>> - </indexterm>
>> -
>> - <para>
>> - When an object is created, it is assigned an owner. The
>> - owner is normally the role that executed the creation statement.
>> - For most kinds of objects, the initial state is that only the owner
>> - (or a superuser) can do anything with the object. To allow
>> - other roles to use it, <firstterm>privileges</firstterm> must be
>> - granted.
>> - There are several different kinds of privilege: <literal>SELECT</>,
>> - <literal>INSERT</>, <literal>UPDATE</>, <literal>DELETE</>,
>> - <literal>TRUNCATE</>, <literal>REFERENCES</>, <literal>TRIGGER</>,
>> - <literal>CREATE</>, <literal>CONNECT</>, <literal>TEMPORARY</>,
>> - <literal>EXECUTE</>, and <literal>USAGE</>.
>> - For more information on the different types of privileges supported by
>> - <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, see the
>> - <xref linkend="sql-grant"> reference page.
>> - </para>
>> -
>> - <para>
>> - To assign privileges, the <command>GRANT</command> command is
>> - used. So, if <literal>joe</literal> is an existing role, and
>> - <literal>accounts</literal> is an existing table, the privilege to
>> - update the table can be granted with:
>> - <programlisting>
>> - GRANT UPDATE ON accounts TO joe;
>> - </programlisting>
>> - The special name <literal>PUBLIC</literal> can
>> - be used to grant a privilege to every role on the system. Writing
>> - <literal>ALL</literal> in place of a specific privilege specifies that all
>> - privileges that apply to the object will be granted.
>> - </para>
>> -
>> - <para>
>> - To revoke a privilege, use the fittingly named
>> - <xref linkend="sql-revoke"> command:
>> - <programlisting>
>> - REVOKE ALL ON accounts FROM PUBLIC;
>> - </programlisting>
>> - </para>
>> -
>> - <para>
>> - The special privileges of an object's owner (i.e., the right to modify
>> - or destroy the object) are always implicit in being the owner,
>> - and cannot be granted or revoked. But the owner can choose
>> - to revoke his own ordinary privileges, for example to make a
>> - table read-only for himself as well as others.
>> - </para>
>> -
>> - <para>
>> - An object can be assigned to a new owner with an <command>ALTER</command>
>> - command of the appropriate kind for the object. Superusers can always do
>> - this; ordinary roles can only do it if they are both the current owner
>> - of the object (or a member of the owning role) and a member of the new
>> - owning role.
>> - </para>
>> - </sect1>
>> -
>> <sect1 id="role-membership">
>> <title>Role Membership</title>
>>
>> --- 281,286 ----
Thanks Bruce. :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-02-21 13:32:23 | Re: Ambiguous index entry for Privileges |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2011-02-21 08:28:15 | Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS |