| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite |
| Date: | 2010-07-17 20:26:17 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimBZvb554biF3gZyVfFdAdswnj9AZdC03UVUzXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 17 July 2010 21:23, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> While they're quite attractive, I actually see them being more
>> confusing than helpful personally, but I could be wrong. I reckon
>> there might be clearer ways of representing statement options. The
>> real problems with the railroad design come when there are lots of
>> references to other diagrams, and you end up with about 10 just for 1
>> statement.
>>
>> Is there a way of testing their usefulness?
>
> Personal experience? I used to find them quite useful when I was
> starting out with Informix.
>
I guess I'm quite used to the existing statement definitions. It's an
elegant idea, just wondering if it scales sanely. Are the examples of
more complex statements?
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Conway | 2010-07-17 20:30:48 | Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-07-17 20:23:32 | Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite |