Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date: 2011-03-28 04:01:40
Message-ID: AANLkTimAUQ2wxZC8+J8YRAnTEcy9jspDBk16Z+8795vQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> While working on adding support for SQL/Med objects to pgAdmin, I'm
>>> quite surprised to see there is no way to add comments to SQL/Med
>>> objects. Is this on purpose or is it just something that was simply missed?
>
>> I think it's an oversight.  We should probably fix this.
>
> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that.  I'd like to see if we can
> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort.  I believe
> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
> of other basic places ...

Are you going to work on this? If not I can pick it up, at least
insofar as making the comment stuff work across the board.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-28 04:06:22 Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Previous Message YAMAMOTO Takashi 2011-03-28 03:16:16 Re: SSI bug?