| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git migration timeline |
| Date: | 2010-08-16 14:19:10 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimAPGPPmJ=0vgoLodGST=UNp3au_LzKpSEiG5tF@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 16:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 15:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I can see the point of wanting to be dead certain the repository isn't
>>> changing under you during the data migration. Perhaps we need an agreed
>>> window between last call for commits and the actual lock-out.
>
>> To prevent that, I just need to shut it down for 2 minutes to rsync
>> the latest changes off it and onto the new git box. Maybe that's how
>> we should do it.
>
> That sounds like a reasonable scheme to me, especially since it leaves
> the cvs repository functional. Dunno about you, but I want a fallback
> plan in case this turns into a disaster ...
Oh, I had no intention whatsoever of *removing* it. Just disabling login to it.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-16 14:33:12 | Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-16 14:18:24 | Re: Git migration timeline |