| From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On Scalability |
| Date: | 2010-07-29 17:52:12 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim7HQQz=qGfW=xDhx-8HNppYxXF48NjnU2-XiNt@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
2010/7/29 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:34 +0200, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
>
>> I expect that a more complex schema will imply higher workloads
>> on the query planner. What I don't know is how the increase in the
>> workload will happen: linearly, sublinearly, polynomially or what?
Do you think I should ask somewhere else?
Any hint?
>> Thanks anyway for the insights, Joshua.
>> Does the 60-100 tables limit applies to a single level
>> of inheritance? Or is it more general?
>
> I do not currently have experience (except that it is possible) with
> multi-level inheritance and postgresql.
Thanks anyway.
--
Vincenzo Romano at NotOrAnd Information Technologies
Software Hardware Networking Training Support Security
--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-07-29 18:16:50 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-07-29 17:39:44 | Re: On Scalability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-07-29 18:16:50 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-07-29 17:39:44 | Re: On Scalability |