| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
| Date: | 2010-09-01 00:35:47 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim69bo9iE5F7OTO0RV412L2bCAe4Z3BnZJn3hFu@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:44:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> fazool mein wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I'm interested in benchmarking synchronous replication, to see how
>> > performance degrades compared to asynchronous streaming replication.
>> >
>> > I browsed through the archive of emails, but things still seem unclear. Do
>> > we have a final agreed upon patch that I can use? Any links for that?
>>
>> No.
>
> That was a mite brusque and not super informative.
>
> There are patches, and the latest from Fujii Masao is probably worth
> looking at :)
I am pretty sure, however, that the performance will be terrible at
this point. Heikki is working on fixing that, but it ain't done yet.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2010-09-01 00:45:47 | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-01 00:34:31 | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |