Re: Bad query performance with more conditions?

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "kaifeng(dot)zhu" <cafeeee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad query performance with more conditions?
Date: 2010-06-24 08:57:57
Message-ID: AANLkTim5cw5pXnK90UTTrv2zL15eSsItKblOw6MRfJTF@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 24 June 2010 09:52, kaifeng.zhu <cafeeee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a table named emails which created by following script:
> create table emails (
>    email_id bigserial primary key,
>    email_msg_id char(36) not null,
>    email_sender text not null)
>
> The table has more than 10 million of records and I have already
> created indexes on email_msg_id and email_sender
>
> Following script finished very quickly (less than 1 seconds):
>    select * from emails where email_msg_id =
> '4dba381b-f55e-02d3-4b4a-95e2e98178e2' limit 1
> But a similar script cost more than ten seconds:
>    select * from emails where email_msg_id =
> '4dba381b-f55e-02d3-4b4a-95e2e98178e2' and email_sender_text =
> 'sender(at)domain(dot)com' limit 1
>
> Both those scripts returns 0 rows of records indeed.
>
> Any comment are highly appreciated.
>

Sounds like the planner took a wrong turn in the 2nd case. Which
version of PostgreSQL are you running?

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kaifeng.zhu 2010-06-24 09:13:49 Fwd: Bad query performance with more conditions?
Previous Message kaifeng.zhu 2010-06-24 08:52:25 Bad query performance with more conditions?