Re: wCTE behaviour

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wCTE behaviour
Date: 2010-11-11 17:36:38
Message-ID: AANLkTim5UBMTuVdu-34HeCKAw4UDFSTRuNk6QE9hhF0s@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> then the conclusion is foregone.  To my mind, they should be thought of
> as running in parallel, or at least in an indeterminate order, just
> exactly the same way that different data modifications made in a single
> INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE command are considered to be made simultaneously.

+1

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-11-11 17:44:07 Re: wCTE behaviour
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-11-11 17:35:19 Re: wCTE behaviour